It had been said by Michelle Obama in 2014 that to have an influence on the political system of the United States, you will have to dole out a huge amount of money. In the former first lady’s statement, she has not mentioned that this statement doesn’t work for everyone.
Many political figures are collecting or coming up with their own funds in order to make it to a common goal – to win. But while they spend so much on their political campaigns, they forget about the people. For the majority of people, the “biggest and fattest check” they could get could be within the low two digits, and several people cannot even make a few dollars from their pocket. That is not just sufficient to impact the political practice, running a competitive advertising campaign, spending on logos, banners, leaflets, events, and others.
The conventional strategy to reduce the impact of inequality to our economy continues to restrict all those fat checks, simply by capping individual donations, the total one individual can provide to strategies, or outside spending designed to impact elections. However, even with no judicial involvement, the big checks and those behind the written check seem to have found various approaches make an effect on political policies and even elections. In times of surprising inequality, the influence of the wealthy over politics cannot be guaranteed. And this had been proven by many pranksters who in some way pranked the truth out from politicians via a prank call app.
Money and Politics – An alternative approach?
Rather than attempting to restrict funds and screwing up — it best to encourage everyone. Think about it. Say that everyone can issue a check, it doesn’t have to be a big and fat check, but just enough that when combined with others, it could be enough for the average individual to run for a political seat, or just enough to bring out issues that ordinary citizens are facing.
This method is the reverse of limits — it is going to clear the system, and also to motivate wider involvement by people, not just as voters, but also as donors and volunteers. A politician who has a wide and broad support system will have a better chance even if the wealthy and big spenders are out there to support their own political figures.
Political figures will have more reason to invest time with common voters who may possibly turn into donors. It will be simpler for an aspirant who does not begin with their very own hard earned cash, or collection of rich friends, or business allies so that the person will be noticed or become competitive.
There are many approaches to use small amounts of community resources for making this vision a real possibility. One which looks like it works well, in several states and also cities, offer voluntary complete community financing to political candidates who also demonstrate an extensive base of help via modest donations. Simply said, thousands of small checks become one big check.